Rubric


 * CATEGORY || 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Ideas & Content || The student has many original ideas and expresses them clearly. The great majority of ideas are related to the assignment. Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. || The student expresses some original ideas. The majority of ideas are related to the assignment. Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. || The ideas expressed are not necessarily original, and are not usually connected to the assignment. Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. || The ideas expressed are not original, often confused and are not connected to discussions around the assignment. Content is minimal, OR there are several factual errors. ||
 * Post Frequency || The entry frequency greatly exceeds course expectations. || The entry frequency is slightly above average. || The entry frequency is slightly below average. || The entry frequency is well below course expectations. ||
 * Writing Quality || No misspellings or grammatical errors. No HTML errors in wiki/blog (e.g., broken links, missing images). || Entries show above average writing style. The content demonstrates that the student reads moderately, and attempts to synthesize information and form new meaning. || Entries show a below average, overly casual writing style with a lack of attention to style. Students pay little attention to other reading and mostly regurgitate previous personal views. || Entries are of very poor quality. There is little to no evidence of reading other information in order to form new meaning of the topics at-hand. ||
 * Community || Contributes greatly to the development of the class wiki/blog. || Contributes adequately to the development of the class wiki/blog. || Contributes moderately to the development of the class wiki/blog. || Contributes minimally to the development of the class wiki/blog. ||